Americans are behind Keystone; the plurality of Canadians too, especially Conservatives

President Obama is sliding in all the polls, as if they were coated in oil. A better explanation, however, is that he is himself quite greasy.

In recent Canadian polling, Canadians are still showing support for the Keystone pipeline even though they’re rightly peeved at President Obama’s dismissal of it, and their knowledge that Canada can easily go west instead, and sell their good, and comparatively clean, and moreover, ethical Canadian oil to Asia. (Don’t say I didn’t warn ya!)

I think many Canadians have been looking for just such an opportunity to prove to America that America is not the only game in town. This is a lesson that President Obama has not learned. Another privately-built Canadian pipeline called the Northern Gateway pipeline  –  to the west  –  is already in the works.

Canadians recently re-elected a Conservative Party government, and there is some antipathy toward the increasingly socialist and anti-business, and possibly anti-Canada Obama, I think.

And what I really like to see is that Conservatives in Canada in particular, (who actually like America, business, economic growth, capitalism, and private enterprise, etc), are really behind Keystone (see graphic below).  The socialist NDP party members are against the Keystone pipeline, which is rather strange in that the NDP is owned and run by left-wing and sometimes Marxist labor unions in Canada, which would stand to benefit from the building of it. But this is a little like Obama’s labor union support base, which supports Keystone, even though Obama is against it.  That’s because Obama made a decision based purely on political grounds. He’s appeasing his rich, far-left greenie base.

I suspect the socialist NDP membership’s biggest problem though, like Obama’s, is that it’s private money building the pipeline, rather than government/taxpayer money. And socialists naturally hate private enterprise and capitalism. This pipeline tends to brightly legitimize the beauty of capitalism and economic freedom, which is counter to their interests as progressives. And it delegitimizes their fanciful big government socialist Utopian idiocy.

As if I had to tell you, the Liberals in Canada don’t have a clue and are totally divided because they can’t figure it out, on account of their having no principles; half of them being a mix of quasi, uneasy socialists and full-on socialists, and the other half waiting for their state-owned media (the dreadful CBC) to tell them how to think.

The most recent Rasmussen polling in the US indicates much the same result as in Canada, only the support is even stronger and more anti-Obama.

Monday, January 23, 2012

Most voters still favor building the Keystone XL pipeline from Canada to Texas and think it will be good for the economy despite President Obama’s decision last week to delay the project for environmental reasons.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 56% of Likely U.S. Voters at least somewhat favor the pipeline, with 36% who Strongly Favor it. Just 27% are opposed, including 12% who Strongly Oppose the project. Sixteen percent (16%) are undecided. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

No wonder Obama didn’t mention it in his State of the Campaign Union speech last night.

 Canadian screenshots are from Sun News Channel in Canada

Obama won’t approve Keystone pipeline? Fine. Canada’s PM Harper to visit China in Feb

Obama pretends he wants to “insource” (another ridiculous Obama-ism which is meant to replace “American”) jobs to America. and yet here’s a prime example of how he sabotages exactly that.

Maybe President Obama thought Canada and its Conservative prime minister were bluffing about selling Canada’s oil to Asia, rather than to Canada’s friend and partner, the USA, if the Keystone oil pipeline project wasn’t approved. But that could have been yet another naive Obama misjudgement. Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper has booked a trip to China in February for meetings with President Hu Jintao and Premier Wen Jiabao.

Eager to sell Alberta oil, Harper schedules return trip to China

Stephen Harper will make his second visit to China next month just as he makes selling oil to Asia a major strategic priority for Canadian trade.  …

…China’s thirst for Canadian oil and Ottawa’s newly reignited interest in selling it, is clearly Mr. Harper biggest topic now.

Since U.S. President Barack Obama delayed a decision on the extension of a pipeline carrying bitumen from Alberta’s oil sands to the Gulf of Mexico, Mr. Harper has insisted that selling it to Asia is now a strategic priority for Canada.

That means building a pipelines from Alberta to the West Coast. …

Just as Obama seems to believe that raising taxes only on wealthy American job-creators won’t have any deleterious effect on the economy; and borrowing billions or trillions of dollars from China to flush down the toilet on specious government “stimulus” nonsense won’t negatively affect the American economy and its security, his hyper-political Keystone pipeline non-decision is proving to be yet another stupid Obama gamble   –  a doubling down on a plethora of other stupid gambles. What’s problematic is that like so many progressives and pro-big-government leftists, Obama blithely uses America itself as his personal poker chips.  And his gambles are not paying off for America. Actually it’s not even paying off for himself, as polls indicate.

Even as I write, the parts are being assembled and the machinery is being built. But not in America.

Aside from Harper’s trip to China, public hearings are taking place in British Columbia on the planned oil pipeline from Alberta through British Columbia to a west coast BC port.  Clearly it’s a pipeline not to transport oil to the U.S., but rather from oil-rich Alberta to the west coast of Canada so it can be shipped to China and other Asia-Pacific countries instead.

The new pipeline, called the Northern Gateway oil pipeline, will be built by Canadian oil giant Enbridge, Inc., which is prepared to invest about $5.5 BILLION in it. Private cash. Not government/taxpayer cash. Similarly, the Keystone pipeline would be built with private-sector cash.

The new Northern Gateway oil pipeline will be a massive jobs-builder and will help further the economic partnership between Canada and Asia for Canada’s vast energy resources.  So there’s lots of enthusiasm for it in Canada (except from the usual left-wing loons and air-headed green enviro mob, funded, by the way, by left-wing American lobbying organizations, and you can follow the usual chain of funders right up to those connected to Barack Obama and other leftists).

Regardless of the decision Obama (or a new president elected in November) finally and inevitably makes, the Northern Gateway pipeline through BC will likely be built. That’s the kind of strategic planning that takes place by private investors (and governments alike) whenever a trading partner  –  the USA in this case  –  becomes an unreliable partner or customer.

And that’s the kind of reality about the world that the left-wing ideological and apparently naive Barack Obama really needed to learn before he became President or even ran for office, and began to put America’s future at greater risk. It’s hopefully also a lesson about business and economics  –  and politics  –  that is becoming increasingly clear for voters.

60% of likely U.S. voters favor building the Keystone XL pipeline. Obama out of touch. And favor.

Polling suggests that 60% of likely U.S. voters are at least somewhat in favor of the Alberta to Texas Keystone XL pipeline. Only 24% are opposed, and 16% are unsure. See “60% Favor Building Keystone XL Pipeline”.

sewer pipe

Sewage pipes from opponents' toilets to the main sewer lines? They're A-OK, Jack! So are the natural gas pipes leading into their own homes? So this is strange science.

Sixty percent being in favor of what is traditionally a massively politically incorrect project is huge, especially in this age of “man-made global warming” idiocy.

I wonder about those who are opposed. I wonder if they are also opposed to the sewer pipe from their own homes’ toilets which feed their crap into the main sewer line out on the street they live on; and if they’re opposed to the all the main sewer lines which traverse the city or village they live in, which find their way to the local treatment plant (or whatever).

Or if they’re opposed to the millions of miles of natural gas pipelines traversing the United States, including quite possibly the one into their homes.  Surely they’re equally as dangerous if they break or leak.

The thing is, those things are equally destructive of the natural environment  –  farmland and aquifers, and so on. Of course like those folks themselves, they’re already there, so…

No let’s face facts. We already know sewage pipes from Keystone pipeline opponents’ toilets, out to the main sewer lines, are A-OK with them.  So are those folks’ natural gas pipes which help them heat their homes and cook. For that matter, their home being built on previously pristine land, possibly once covered in natural forests or wetlands and possibly once occupied by bountiful wildlife, is just fine too. But build no more, now that we’re settled in! if I understand correctly.

John Edwards house

John Edwards' enormous anti-green multi-million-dollar spread, carved into once-forested land.

It all reminds me of the Democratic Party’s infamous hypocrite, liar, and adulterer John Edwards, who, while decrying such things as income inequality, unfair treatment of women, ruining the environment, and “man-made global warming,” built his palatial mansion in what is clearly the midst of once forested land which he obviously clear-cut (see the picture nearby). With nary a windmill or solar panel in sight.

Or maybe they’re opposed to using ethical oil from an environmentally aware and clean country, and moreover, a close ally (Canada), rather than getting it from an Arab OPEC country which might arguably hate America, or from Venezuelan whose socialist leader clearly does hate America? That would be an odd stance. Sort of insane. Unless you too hate America I suppose.

It’s too hard to believe that they really don’t care about the tens of thousands of jobs that would be “saved or created”  –  by private enterprise  –  if the pipeline gets built.  This one is the hardest one to figure out.  Except that it’s private enterprise building it and creating those jobs without federal taxpayer “stimulus” cash from the benevolent leader, President Stimulus (or more accurately, borrowed cash from communist China). And that’s a huge negative to left-wingers, believe it or not.  The Left would see this thing much differently if the government of Barack Hu Jintao Obama had proposed building it with taxpayer cash.

But there you go.  It’s one of these things or a combination of them. And they’re all bad excuses.

It’s hard to figure the logic of the people opposed to this. Except that the left-wing and self-styled greenie, President Barack Obama, has come out as, at best, ambivalent about the pipeline being built, delaying a decision on its construction until after the next election (so probably well into 2013 sometime).

So that bears analysis.

Obama’s delay tactic is a crass, transparently political move, crudely designed to appease his far-left enviro-fundamentalist voter base, thereby (he hopes) helping him secure his own re-election.  America be damned.

The fact is, he ran for office on a holier-than-thou platform of being above all of the partisan politics, and above the political fray, and being beyond the reach of what he disdained as special interests and professional Washington lobbyists.  That was then. All this crass politicking is designed only to serve his own greedy political power needs, and it will harm America and Americans.

And so those are the 25% “against”, plus the 16% who are “unsure”.  They are Obama’s sycophants and useful idiots. That’s as close to “logic” as we can get on this one.  And it’s not only illogical, it’s dangerously stupid.

It’s ridiculous, is what it is.  By which I mean it’s ridiculous to follow a poor leader who constantly makes terrible decisions based on his self interest and quest for power.

According to Gallup’s latest poll, Obama’s job approval is only a dismal 41%.  At this rate, it will stay that way through at least November 2012.