Is America an Idiocracy?

In 1951, Ray Bradbury published Fahrenheit 451, a futuristic novel in which books are burned, and the citizenry occupies itself by watching hours of TV on wall-to-wall sets. Contrary to popular belief, Bradbury says Fahrenheit 451 wasn’t about censorship or McCarthyism. It was about how TV undermines interest in reading and learning.

In 2006, Mike Judge released the film Idiocracy, in which the main character, Joe Bauers, undergoes a suspended-animation experiment and wakes up in the year 2505. He’s unable to communicate, because “the English language had deteriorated into a hybrid of hillbilly, valley girl, inner-city slang and various grunts.” The degenerate morons who occupy this brave new world amuse themselves with vapid, vulgar reality shows like “Ow, My Balls!” (Which, by the way, is exactly what it sounds like.)

Are you laughing? You probably shouldn’t. Fahrenheit 451 and Idiocracy aren’t dystopian fantasies—we’re already there.

In case you’re not convinced, Oxygen just announced* a new reality show featuring rapper “Shawty Lo,” his eleven children, and his ten “baby mamas.” According to ABC News, he “refer[s] to his children’s mothers with nicknames like Jealous Baby Mama, Baby Mama from Hell, and Shady Baby Mama. The show also introduces viewers to Lo’s 19-year-old girlfriend.”

Thankfully, some groups on the left and right protested, with the Parents Television Council deeming it “grotesquely irresponsible and exploitative.” Still, the fact that Oxygen believed there was an audience for a show with such a tawdry premise (and a star who calls himself “Shawty Lo”) is depressing enough.

The main consumers of this garbage? My generation, the 18-to-29 set. We have more opportunities for cultural and intellectual enrichment than any previous generation, but we don’t take them. As Mark Bauerlein revealed in his aptly named book The Dumbest Generation, less than 10 percent of young people attend plays, ballets, or musical performances, only 23 percent visited a museum in the last year, and a record low number of us read for fun.

So where are America’s teens and twenty-somethings? Parked in front of the TV, watching Jersey Shore.

You know, the reality show that added “smushing” and “gorillas” to our vocabulary. (Shockingly, the latter is not a reference to the cast members’ IQs.) In the 90s, the casts on early reality shows like The Real World had candid, intelligent discussions about everything from racism to gay rights to AIDS. They look like Rhodes scholars compared to the cast of Jersey Shore, who talk about…well, I’m not sure what, because the only episode I watched was a series of bleeps. The show doesn’t address any current events or any ideas—it’s a steady stream of drinking, fighting, and cussing.

And if you wonder where the increase in girl-on-girl aggression is coming from, tune into any of the Real Housewives series. The entire show revolves around materialistic, shallow women with bad plastic surgery cat-fighting and back-stabbing. As Ann Coulter put it, “Real Housewives is white trash pretending to be jetsetters.” And yet millions of viewers still tune in every week, admiring them, emulating them, and imagining this is how the wealthy and fashionable really live.

In August, more people tuned into TLC’s abomination Here Comes Honey Boo Boo than the Republican National Convention. In case you’ve somehow missed it, the show follows the adventures of “redneck” mom June and her four daughters (allegedly sired by four different men). This show is especially exploitative. In a recent episode, June’s teen daughter gave birth to a baby with six fingers. Instead of feeling sympathy for this poor child, the audience was supposed to snicker—all that was missing was the laugh track in the background. Laughing and leering at other people’s pain and misfortune is par for the course in this genre.

Therefore, it’s no surprise that researchers at the University of Michigan found today’s college students shockingly lacking in empathy, especially compared to their 1970s counterparts. They partially blamed the rise of reality TV for this trend.

“These shows may be profitable, but the primary basis for many of them seems to be to put people in painful, embarrassing or humiliating situations for the rest of us to watch — and, presumably, be entertained,” James Key wrote in USA Today. “This assault on our intelligence is not healthy for the soul.”

Not to mention it’s taking the place of activities that engage the mind, rather than rotting it.

If you don’t want America to become the country we saw in Idiocracy, turn it off.

 

* Editor’s note: On January 15, 2013, as a result of public pressure, Oxygen Network decided not to broadcast “All My Babies’ Mamas.” Read about it here.

UPDATED: CNN panelist calls Romney a “douche.” Panel then yucks it up.

I’m not prone to getting all worked-up about political name-calling. It’s the lies and hypocrisy that tick me off no end. A better example of that than what follows, and of the biased, liberal media and their abject hypocrisy — cannot be found.

Just now, on CNN, on Wolf Blitzer’s “Situation Room”, while conducting a panel discussion on the women’s vote, far-left panelist Van Jones called Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney a “douche.” Twice. Did I mention it was a discussion of the women’s vote?

CNN Van Jones calling Mitt Romney a doucheVan Jones, a socialist, was President Obama’s “Green Jobs” Czar.

So much for Barack Obama’s call for, and I quote him directly, debate “without vitriol, without name calling,” and his other fatuous, deceptive, one-sided calls for “civility.”

At the end of that discussion, a lighthearted, smiling lead panelist Gloria Borger, who is a CNN news anchor, suggested, in a joking manner, that Van Jones find a better adjective to use instead of “douche”, whereupon the whole panel yucked it up in a great group chuckle. The other panelists were former White House spokesman Ari Fleischer, former GOP Congressman JC Watts, and Franklin Foer, editor of the left-wing The New Republic.

This perfectly exemplifies just how deeply systemic the liberal bias lies within the veins of what the sensible folks like me keep calling “the liberal media.”  They’re so liberal they don’t even know how liberal they are.

Can you just imagine a conservative pundit with deep ties to Romney calling Barack Obama a “douche” on CNN? You can’t even say the word “apartment” without every liberal pundit like Van Jones reflexively calling you a “racist,” and every media reporter doing a five-part exposé of the massive “smear” and “gaffe” and grave, election-ending “insult.”

It is up to CNN to fix this. But so far, they haven’t, and I don’t think they will.

Remember that (a) Van Jones is a past Obama administration official in charge of so-called “green  jobs”.  He was Obama’s so-called “Green Jobs Czar”. Remember (b) that the moderator of tonight’s presidential debate is none other than CNN’s Candy Crowley.

By the way, recent polling suggests that where Obama used to have a 13-point (or even greater) advantage over Romney on women voters, that margin has shrunk to zero. In fact women are now trending toward Romney.

Now that’s worth a chuckle.  Just don’t look for it on CNN.

UPDATE: Apparently CNN’s crack “fact-checkers” went to work on the name-calling Van Jones “douche” caper, and as a result, Van Jones just did a strange and obviously hastily-arranged walk-on, on Wolf Blitzer’s Situation Room, to apologize to Wolf Blitzer, to the audience, and to Romney, for his “very poor choice of words.” That doesn’t erase the group chuckle, nor the anchor’s seeming acceptance of the smear or the group chuckle she participated in.

The Insane Stream Media Hates Gracious Christianity and Loves Violent Islam

Man, don’t cha love how the Insane Stream Media and their soft-brain disciples make Christians out to be fish-stickered, bug-eyed equals to incensed Islam? If you were to accept what the White House, some atheists and prattling gay activists say about Christians as true, you’d think the Church is chomping at the bit to chop off some heads of unbelievers, glory to Gawd!

Yep, if you were to believe the barf belched out by the BS brokers on the ludicrous Left, you’d stagger away stupid with the belief that there is little disparity between conservative Christians and militant Muslims.

As a matter of fact, you probably would be bamboozled into believing that Islam is a peaceful, Little House on the Prairie religion being temporarily hijacked by Jihadist renegades, and Christianity … Christianity is the real vicious, charity-vacant cult that’s vying for the opportunity to seize the whip and whip us good.

Yes, the Insane Stream Media’s reality stylists are working their butts off trying to convince us TV-addled cattle of two primary things: 1) Violent jihad is not based on the Koran, and 2) All conservative Christians are theocrats ready to burn Elton John at the stake, stone Snooki in a nearby gravel pit and governmentally ramrod Christianity down everyone’s pie hole.

I haven’t seen this kind of ham-fisted, farcical façade foisted upon the public since Michael Jackson tried to make out with Lisa Marie in an attempt to convince us all he’d found true love in an adult of the opposite sex.

Look, there’s no denying violent things have been done by the Church and in the name of God, but that has been the exception and not the rule. In addition, when the Church has spent time with its head up its butt doing bogus things, the Church’s leaders have historically owned it when wrong, have not repeated the gaffe, have grabbed the wheel and have effectively steered saints out of any erroneous, detrimental ditch.

Not so with Islam.

In Robert Spencer’s book, Religion of Peace? Why Christianity Is and Islam Isn’t, Bob shows those who can still be shown anything factual the massive and fundamental differences between Islam and Christianity. They are not equal no matter how much the blatherers of political correctness purport them to be. Their beliefs are not similar, nor their practices, nor their means of spreading their message—and to think otherwise could cost you your ass.

Spencer points out the crystal clear facts that clash with the current anti-Christian hype, such as …

· Most Muslims do not condemn jihad.

· Christianity and Islam have neither similar traditions nor similar modern realities.

· Christian religious violence, real or imagined, does not mitigate the reality of jihad.

· A “Christian theocracy” in America is a figment of the Left’s imagination.

· The Islamic world has never developed the distinction between religious and secular law that is inherent in Christianity.

· Christianity has embraced reason—and Islam has embraced … “Silence! I kill you!”

· The Koran does not invite interpretation, and Muslim leaders refuse to discuss how to fit their beliefs into modern society.

· Youtube flicks, Political differences and unwanted international interference are not, in fact, the cause of the turmoil in Iraq and Middle Eastern antagonism toward the west.

· Jews, Christians and peoples of other faiths (or no faiths) are equally at risk from militant Islam—especially gays and women.

· The most determined enemies of western civilization may not be the jihadists at all, but the leftists who fear their churchgoing neighbors more than Islamic terrorists.

Listen, 21st century truth reconstructors … you’ve gotta relax. Please do us all a favor and go get healed from your bad Sunday school experience and lay down your church-grinding axe. Thinking people aren’t buying the “Christianity = Islam” smack.

Get real, Goofy. You and I both know that regardless of what a few loopy CINOs (Christians in name only) have done via violence in the name of the Father, it’s not in the body of Christian doctrine to hack off the noggin of the obstreperous. There’s not even an obscure passage in the Book of Revelation that some demented clod could twist like your Gumby doll to make Christian Scripture green-light your demise or anyone else’s. Additionally, Christians aren’t longing for TBN to replace D.C. as our nation’s headquarters.

So chill, you shrill shredders of Christianity.

On the flip side, it is within the pages of the Koran to convert, conquer or kill non-Islamic people. And I’m a thinkin’ that no matter how much you work to besmirch Christianity and misinform the public on behalf of militant Islam, that if said Muslims had it their way, you would be a deceased grease stain on God’s green earth.

Therefore, gay guy, loosen that neckerchief and relax on the anti-Christian rhetoric, okay? Atheists, dial down and go back to studying monkeys (or whatever you do), and secularists, switch to decaf and exhale because you guys are barking up the wrong tree in trying to paint Christians as a coercive, could-be-violent cabal like militant Islam.

The insulting idiocy so stupid it’s funny: the Left’s claim of Republican “War On Women”

Are liberals and their media out of their minds? OK naturally that was rhetorical. Of course they are. So, OK, are they just pretending to be even higher than usual with this “War On Women” canard? Because they can’t really, honestly believe this idiotspeak, even if it is their own construct, can they?

This logically ridiculous fallacy that the Republicans are fighting a “War On Women” is so stupid, an 8-year-old (girl) child could see through it and could winsomely report, Oh, they’re just saying that to make Facebook friends mommy! You’re so silly! So are you, other mommy! Where’s daddy? 

Assuming Democrats, liberals, teachers, Hollywood, progressives writ large, and their vast news media aren’t that stupid (which is me being generous), then by repeating this “War On Women” mantra over and over, aren’t they really just assuming you are so stupid that you’ll buy it?

Well yes, that’s the one soluble notion here. That’s what’s plausible, here. In fact that’s the ONLY plausible explanation.

I’ve given this some thought but just to make sure, let me consider this again as passed through the filter of the United Nations Climate Change Politburo.  Yeah confirmed. Science settled. Plus I checked with the kid down the street. It really isn’t that hard. Let’s review:

The notion that they think you are totally stupid is not actually so much of a stretch. They think government is smarter than you too. They think they, through government, can raise you and your family better than you, and you should become less reliant on yourself and your family, and more and more reliant on the government for everything from your soup to your nuts; from before being born (if not aborted by them), through to your euthanasia; and even after death, when they take your estate, redistribute it, and tax the crap out of it. And they think they should engineer your salt, sugar, soda-pop, trans-fats, Michelle’s collard greens, organic/non-organic food intake; and your health care provisions, your media needs, your education needs, your housing needs, so many other basic elements of life… because you’re too stupid to do it on your own. Therefore it’s not at all strident to extend the logic to the notion that they think you are so stupid, you’d buy into what we here all acknowledge is idiotspeak about the Republicans fighting a “War On Women.”

Just in case you are a liberal woman or in the media, let me further explain it: Women make up at least half the country. And actually, more women vote than men. So the Republican Party, as a result of one of their expensive billionaire-financed polls and free-market capitalist-researched (and Fox News!) election strategies of some sort, would launch a well-crafted, multifaceted “War On Women,” and thus purposely and knowingly lose the vote of half of America, right off the bat, and obviously lose the election; and then lose every election forever more. And end as a Party. A party of total idiots.

Yeah. Check. That makes sense. (Granted, it actually make sense to those brilliants on the ever-objective MSNBC, and in Canada on the state-owned CBC; and at the New York Times, Paul Krugman could probably make a case for it on account of it being economically beneficial for the country, owing to the loathsome Republicans’ supposed love of America, or some-such). And oh sure, liberals and the media, by repeating this mantra for them to the people, hoping and expecting them buy it, do not show that they think people are completely stupid.

You buy that, right?

Furthermore, assuming most women have a male around them, like a brother, a husband, a boyfriend, a father, a son, or just some friendly guys who would defend “their” women (oh God, please don’t split hairs even more), rather than support and defend and vote for a massive billionaire-funded women-hating political group which have launched a “War On Women,” and which plan to take over the country and turn America into a (obviously) male-dominated, anti-women patriarchy, which would take away women’s rights as they do in all those horrid, stone-age anti-women Sharia-based Islamist jihadist countries the Republicans have also launched a war on (hang on, oh well…), the Republicans will have purposely tossed nearly the entire male vote too.

You buy that too, right?

And let’s not forget all those women who are Republicans. Not just the ones who are running for office, but those who work for them, support them, and all the women who actually vote Republican. Well they are an odd bunch aren’t they?! The Left would have you believe these women are morons, or are Stockholm Syndrome victims, or are just nutty martyrs of some sort.

What an insult to them.  It’s like liberals hate women who aren’t on their side. It’s weird.

Oh and ALSO:

We’re to believe the Republicans only want to serve (male) “millionaires and billionaires.”  About .03% of the population. And so they accept being rejected by virtually 100% of the folks. Right. That’s an election strategy. And this is also what the Left (Dems, media, teachers, Hollywood, etc) want you to believe:  the Republicans are also fighting a “War On”… water. Yes, Republicans also hate water. They hate Latino people, Black people, gay people, young people  –  especially those seeking a job and who are in school or want to be in school or who plan to grow up  –  all people with pre-existing health concerns, people who are old, people who plan to get old, veterans, soldiers who have come out as gay, poor people, middle-class people, “working” people, union members, and, natch, they hate “the environment” as a general matter.

Yeah. Vote Democrat. They love you and are fighting for you because they believe in you, and America.

 

Stupid Liberals Network failing in cable news ratings

This past week in irony:
CNN
is the super-smart and ever so hip liberal media news network which is so systemically engorged with mentally immature liberals, and lacking in adult supervision, that it found it quite acceptable to play the Pink song “Stupid Girls” (lyrics: “Aha, aha. Stupid girl, stupid girls, stupid girls…”) in its bumper lead-in to a story about Sarah Palin; and then think that it can get away with that without even being called out on it.

Watch:

CNN going down logoAnd then when they are called on it, as any half intelligent person would know they would be, they make the incredibly dumb-ass calculation that its audience is so utterly gullible that they would accept, as CNN’s mia culpa, insultingly stupid excuses.

This is their actual excuse: “The music selection was a poor choice and was not intended to be linked to any news story. We regret any perception that they were planned together.”  The only thing that could have made their excuse funnier, or dumber, is if they added their catch-phrase “the most trusted name in news,” here.

God they’re smart.

This week:
Once again, it’s a great wonder why CNN’s ratings are sliding, and Fox News Channel totally dominates the cable news ratings, doubling, or nearly so, all the others including CNN, combined, in its total audience numbers. All the top prime time news and news analysis shows are on Fox News Channel. Yet the liberal hipsters like to call Fox News Channel and its viewers “dumb”.

We are not the least bit surprised to find that super-smart CNN continues its ratings slide even further, this past month.

July 2012 Ratings: CNN Continues to Struggle

By Merrill Knox on July 31, 2012 3:31 PM
CNN was down double digits across the board in July. Compared to July 2011, the network is -20% in Total Viewers and -23% in Aged 25-54 in Total Day. In primetime, CNN is down -23% in Total Viewers and -26% in the demographic.

All CNN has to do, and all CNN is supposed to be about, and all CNN holds itself out to be, is “trust us, we’re grownups, and we’ve deployed all manner of resources to do our jobs right.” Well actually, it seems as though they’ve given it up. They’re just joking around now. They literally (still) call themselves “most trusted name in news.”  Clearly even that is a lie. But whatever the case, implied therein is the sentence “we’re serious people, and serious about our jobs reporting the news in a trustworthy and reliable way, so watch us.” But that ship has sailed.

CNN is intelligent. Even at the precipice of disaster they find it quite normal and natural to play cheap, juvenile politics with whatever little goodwill is left in their already depressed inventory, and make the supposedly conscious editorial decision to do an idiotic, disrespectful thing like smearing Sarah Palin, a huge big-name favorite of conservatives  –  a group representing twice as many Americans as liberals. But of course we know Palin’s a political figure who just doesn’t happen to be among the pop-favorites of the idiot liberal kids who work at CNN (and apparently in most ever other news organization, and actually, everywhere).

This is actually how liberals think. No it really is. Think about it. This is how they’re running America right now.

 

Welcome to Obama’s Total BS Tour of Fantasy 2012

Those huge, fake, Greek-style columns Obama had at one major event in 2008 are definitely too ironic to use this time around, given Obamas big fake columnswhat has happened economically in Greece recently, and the similarity of the trajectory Obama has set America on, circa 2012 BC, under Obama’s greasy rule. So this latest twist on the King Obama saga comes as a bit of a surprise. But it also provides an object lesson in how the mainstream media is covering for the buffoonery of the Obama campaign, since we can only imagine if a Republican had made the choices described here.

And who lays this all out for us? In still another surprise, it’s Obama’s apparent politics ally Politico.com, as they soberly (rather than in pure mocking tones  –  which they would if it were the GOP) describe what strikes me as one of the most cynical, awkward campaign decisions and displays of political cowardliness and buffoonery that I’ve seen in many a campaign cycle.

Let’s begin with a photo I found of Bank of America Stadium in Charlotte:

Bank of America StadiumSee, that’s where Team We Hate Corporations – Especially Banks Obama is holding their big huge event in September, which makes Team We Hate Corporations – Especially Banks Obama feel…. awkward!

Even though they accept huge donations from huge banks and corporations, and in the last election huge banks and corporations far out-contributed to Obama and Democrats compared to Republicans (in spite of the total lies Democrats have been telling you), this inconvenient truth certainly does not conform to their lies and their anti-business rhetoric.

So…

Welcome to ‘Panthers Stadium’

By MAGGIE HABERMAN
7/17/12
7:38 AM EDT

National Democrats have repeatedly touted their stand against taking corporate money for their convention in September, and so it was striking to see two emails from the DNC host committee referring to the Charlotte venue where President Obama will speak as “Panthers Stadium.”

It’s the place where the Panthers play, but it’s actually called Bank of America stadium.

(Also on POLITICO: Charlotte merchants not feeling the love)

A recent email from the host committee signed by former Al Gore campaign manager Donna Brazile urged people to win a trip to Charlotte for the event, which will wrap “Thursday night at Panthers Stadium with President Obama.”

Another email in June made the same pitch about the stadium.

A host committee spokeswoman didn’t respond to an email. But it’s not like the stadium was ever called Panthers Stadium – first opened in 1996, it was Carolinas Stadium, and later Ericsson Stadium. Then the current corporate iteration.

As one commenter wrote, good thing they didn’t book their event at the Staples Center. They’d have to rename it “Reams o’ Recycled Paper Center.”

I know this seems like a jab at Obama over a picayune detail, but it’s really not. Oh it’s a jab, but it’s not a picayune detail. This betrays Obama and his team of phonies as illusionists no better than the Wizard of Oz. It’s emblematic of just how little respect they have for their base, and for the intelligence of Democrats and Americans generally. Or worse: this really is just how completely phony and sycophantic the citizens on the left have become for their emperor Obama, who now obviously wears no clothes;  to the extent where they have become nothing more than useful idiots, all obediently joining Team Obama into trying to sucker Americans into believing in him and them despite their deceptive rhetoric.

It’s pretty disgraceful from whatever angle you view it.

Obama panders to Hollywood on gay marriage

President Barack Obama has changed his mind about same-sex marriage again, partly after discussing the issue with his daughters Malia, 13, and Sasha, 10.

Nice. Now we wait for the Congressional Medal of Honor to be awarded to the “awesome cute guy” from One Direction. Can you imagine how the media would have reacted if Obama had said he’d decided to preserve the definition of marriage after chatting to the kids, or if a Republican president had used a similar line to justify a policy?

It’s all sheer nonsense, of course, just a folksy attempt to disguise the fact that Obama’s Hollywood buddies told him the donations and fundraising parties would disappear unless he did something for their favourite cause. Most Americans don’t care about same-sex marriage. Many gay people don’t care about it. Equality, tolerance, a clumsy but vital co-existence. That’s what is essential to a civilized handling of sexuality. Marriage is not an entitlement but a social institution, not a human right but a child-centred entity based around natural law. Someone’s sexuality is their own business, and they should never be denied a job, home or respect because of it. That, however, is the sort of appalling behaviour now being projected at people who disagree with same-sex marriage, which is one of the bitterest ironies of contemporary politics.

Back to Obama. He can’t be re-elected without the almost unanimous support of black and Hispanic America. Not going to happen, Mr. President. You’ve done nothing for African-Americans, and their overwhelming objection to same-sex marriage is less important to you than the obsession with it among the chattering classes, in particular those moral champions of the world in Hollywood.

How gruesome it is that when Iranian protesters are slaughtered or when Africans in Sudan are massacred in legions, people like Iron Man Robert Downey Jr. and Spider-Man Tobey Maguire say nothing, but when their gay friends want to marry their other gay friends, they demand the president change the country and alienate millions.

Republican candidate Mitt Romney, who has hardly mentioned the issue, referred to marriage being between one man and one woman at an address to a Christian university last weekend, and was immediately described on CNN and elsewhere as making marriage a political issue. Mind you, Mitt doesn’t have any superheroes in his camp, so this sort of hilariously one-sided and dishonest approach is rather inevitable.

The Obama-loving media also managed to find some story about Romney playing a prank on a classmate when he was a teenager, and maybe even — good God, can it be true? — using the word “gay” in a less than positive context. In the universe of liberal authoritarianism, I suppose this disqualifies someone from ever holding public office, but to me it means someone acted like a kid when he was a kid. Then he grew up, and realized that such innocuous but dumb behaviour was not appropriate.

Unlike Obama, who thinks bullying churches and cutting away at religious freedom when it comes to health care is entirely OK. The difference then is Romney grew up and has put away childish things, but Obama is still playing with them.

What it is, stupid.

Two columns by two thinkers, who are thinking the same thing today:

(“Stupid” is Team Obama and its sycophantic mainstream media division. Yes, the “evolve” was a FAIL. Stupid.)

 

EXTRA STUPID:

And here’s a lesser effort from MotherJones.com:
It’s the Inequality, Stupid

Sentimentally, over at Business Standard:
It’s only the sentiment, stupid!

Energybulletin.net says, energetically:
It’s the system, Stupid!

The immasmartypants blog empathetically insists:
It’s the empathy, stupid

Ministrymatters.com preaches:
It’s Jesus, Stupid

 

But bringing it full circle, gormogons.com joins Limbaugh and Rasmussen (and the people), and gets it right.
It’s The Jobs, Stupid

 

A Post-Racial Lynch Mob

Even after the Duke lacrosse case, Texaco executives allegedly using the N-word in private meetings — which turned out to be “St. Nicholas” — the Tawana Brawley case, not to mention virtual hailstorms of racist graffiti and nooses materializing on college campuses, all of which invariably end up having been put there by the alleged victims, the Non-Fox Media (NFM) didn’t even pause before conjuring a racist plot in the shooting death of Trayvon Martin in Florida last month.

Like Captain Ahab searching for the Great White Whale, the NFM is constantly on the hunt for proof of America as “Mississippi Burning.”

Over St. Patrick’s Day weekend, the month after Martin was killed, gangs in Chicago shot 10 people dead, including a 6-year-old girl, Aliyah Shell, who was sitting with her mother on their front porch.

One imagines MSNBC hosts heaving a sign of relief that little Aliyah was not shot by a white man, and was thus spared the horror of being a victim of racism.

As it happens, Trayvon Martin wasn’t shot by a white man either, but by George Zimmerman, a mixed-race Hispanic who lives in a diverse (47 percent white) gated community and tutors black kids.

But Hispanic is close enough for the NFM. They’re chasing the Great White Whale of racist America and don’t have time to check to see if the whale is actually a guppy.

Since the cat leapt out of the bag on Zimmerman being Hispanic, the media have begun calling him a “white Hispanic.”

Not being a race-obsessed liberal, I don’t particularly care, but it’s indisputable that Zimmerman is brown. I saw his face carved on the side of a Mayan temple in the Yucatan. Using his mother’s maiden name, he would be admitted to the University of Michigan law school on a full scholarship.

Apart from that, pretty much all that is known with certainty is that Zimmerman called the police to report a suspicious character in his neighborhood, and shortly thereafter he shot and killed Martin.

On the basis of little else, the media conjured a Hollywood script: A “white” man was “stalking” a little black kid — who could be Obama’s son! — confronted him, beat him senseless as the small black child screamed for help, and finally shot the kid dead, “just because he was black.”

Two weeks of nonstop hysteria later, it turns out that every part of that gripping plot is based on nothing that could be called a reasonable assumption, much less a fact.

The NFM’s theory of the case might be true, just as it might be true that the loud bang I just heard outside my door is Godzilla returning to terrorize Manhattan. I, like the NFM, have no facts supporting my theory. (Although mine is more credible because Al Sharpton is not involved and none of my facts are provably false, such as the NFM’s claim about Zimmerman being “white.”)

First of all, there’s no reason to believe Zimmerman followed Martin after the police told him not to, which is the linchpin of much excited reporting.

Zimmerman told the police, his friends and his lawyer that he walked back to his car after hanging up with the police and was waylaid by Martin. No witnesses have told the press otherwise.

We don’t know if -– as the NFM has baldly asserted — it was Martin yelling “Help!” during the struggle. Before the case became a nationwide sensation, the lead detective told the Orlando (Fla.) Sentinel that the police had played all the 911 calls for Martin’s father, and he said the voice crying “Help!” was not his son’s.

(The father has subsequently retracted that.)

Before the shooting was even a twinkle in the eye of MSNBC, an eyewitness gave a detailed account to the local media, indicating that it was Martin who was on top of Zimmerman, pummeling him, as Zimmerman screamed “Help!”

The police report says Zimmerman’s nose was bleeding and his back covered in grass stains when they arrived at the scene. His lawyer and friends say he was treated for a broken nose the next day.

There’s no sense in arguing in public about such facts. The medical records exist or they do not.

Of course, the information contradicting the media’s fantasy comes to us only in the form of witness statements and police reports appearing in the press, not as evidence in a formal criminal investigation.

It’s hard to tell where the NFM’s suppositions are coming from inasmuch as they simply report their version as hard fact. But all their evidence seems to come only from Martin’s family and girlfriend. Can we start trying all criminal defendants based exclusively on the testimony of the victim’s friends and relatives?

Among the reasons to be suspicious of the media as impartial judges of the evidence is that they keep showing us snapshots from Martin’s childhood, rather than any recent photos.

Without doing research, the average person would think Martin was a slight 12-year-old whippersnapper at the time of the shooting, rather than a strapping 6-foot, 160-pound 17-year-old. Indeed, he was 3 inches taller than Zimmerman, according to the police report.

Why aren’t they showing us Zimmerman’s baby pictures? (And why didn’t we get to see baby pictures of the Duke lacrosse players? I bet they were adorable.)

CNN ceaselessly reported the allegation that Zimmerman could be heard in the background of one 911 call using an archaic racial epithet. Before playing the tape, correspondent Gary Tuchman first announced what the slur was supposed to be (“f*****g coon”).

There’s nothing like suggesting the answer in advance to improve reliability! Police should try that in lineups.

Then the same network that couldn’t find the Jeremiah Wright tapes for sale in a church lobby brought in “one of the best audio experts in the business” to enhance the tape — take the bass away here, add volume there — and played the 1.6-second loop again and again, just in case you were not suggestible enough the first time.

Still, all that can be heard on the enhanced tape is “cha-chu, cha-chu, cha-chu.”

But Tuchman wrapped up this demonstration by saying, “You know, it sounds like this allegation could be accurate, but I wouldn’t swear to it in court. That’s what it sounds like to me.”

To the small percentage of CNN’s audience with triple-digit IQs, it was comedy gold. The only thing missing was Tipper Gore playing the audio backward to reveal satanic lyrics.

(Incidentally, the Nexis transcript of the indecipherable “cha-chu” sound reads: “ZIMMERMAN: F*****g coons, f*****g coons. F*****g coons. F*****g coons. F*****g coons.” Except it doesn’t use asterisks.)

All this may give you an inkling of why we rely on the criminal justice system to determine guilt in criminal cases and not the fervid imaginations of the race-obsessed media.

Today is the shortest day of the year; least daylight time for government to screw things up.

Sadly, they’ll just turn on some lights, and continue to screw things up.

I sure hope the light they use comes from those ugly $40 florescent twisty enviro bulbs that don’t fit into our old standard light fixtures  –  the light fixtures that all have to be replaced, at minimally $40 a pop, now that the government is trying to make all Americans buy and use, by force of law, those stupid $40 florescent twisty enviro bulbs. Forcing, mind you, by way of their big nanny-state government laws and regulations created by them in pursuit of their idiotic political central government planning and social-engineering agendas.

Take Obama.  No I mean take him right out of the White House. That will save about $40 per second.

Today, on the shortest day of the year, his liberal media division turned on their non-florescent TV lights (I’m pretty sure the law doesn’t apply to TV cameras fixed on Obama’s mug), and gazed upon his greatness, then they obediently sat there taking notes, and drank it all in as he read, off his ridiculous teleprompters, a carefully crafted “This is exactly why people get so frustrated with Washington” piece of political bullcrap disguised as something non-partisan and  meaningful.  This, from a president who, as we’ve seen lately in lieu of actually being president and making deals and getting things done  –  like a budget  –  has chosen to spend precious hours in the past few months burning through tons of CO2 and spending countless millions of taxpayer dollars on simply flying around America on Air Force One, campaigning.  Campaigning so he can continue to maintain control over the people and their behavior and and carry on re-arranging America on his left-wing, big government terms, which has already cost Americans, now and well into the future, a huge portion of their earnings.

Seeing hyper-political politicians get up there on the big media-provided bully pulpit, and rambling off a whole lot of hyper-political crap from a teleprompter (because they’re incapable of even speaking about something they’re pretending is so important from their own heart and brain)  –  is actually “exactly why people get so frustrated with Washington.”

In actual fact, not standing on principle, and instead, doing only what’s politically expedient, even after a 2008 campaign promising to end that sort of hyper partisan political culture in Washington –  is “exactly why people get so frustrated with Washington.”

Want more light?  OK: Voting for yet another 11th-hour Band Aid solution to help save this president’s political hide, and to cover-up this president’s and his fellow Democrats’ inadequacies, like not passing a budget in over 900 days, and like this current Band Aid  –  a ridiculous two-month extension of a payroll tax holiday, instead of a full year-long extension, for political expediency  –  is “exactly why people get so frustrated with Washington.”

Not jumping  –  for political reasons  –  on the biggest and most obvious and legitimate “shovel-ready project,” the Keystone pipeline project, which would help end American dependance on unethical oil from lousy foreign sources  –  sources that clearly don’t even like America or Americans … is what Americans are sick and tired of. The Keystone pipeline project is one which would be financed by private investors instead of more so-called “stimulus” cash bilked from current and future American taxpayers and borrowed from communists in China.

Democrats suddenly calling payroll taxes “taxes”  –  instead of what they have been trying to call their Obamacare taxes (“premiums” or “payroll deductions,” for political expediency) just so that they can now dub them a Obama “tax break” (for pure political expediency), is “exactly why people get so frustrated with Washington.”

40-dollar BS banner

Click to see the graphics from WhiteHouse.gov -- the government web site now being used for partisan political gain.

He muttered on and on, this morning, to the useful idiots, about what $40 means to average American workers, in a pure political play. This, after overseeing the blowing, by Democrats, of at least $5 TRILLION of future taxpayers’ cash and essentially making $40 of workers’ cash a mere millisecond’s worth of  interest on what is the Obama debt, for decades to come. To say nothing of the $40 light bulb.

In his now typical hyper political ramble, in which he blasts politicians for being “political” and “partisan,” he summarily blasted only the Republicans  –  not the Democrats, and not himself  — for their  –  not his  –  failure to make a deal.  Failing  –  as he was busy campaigning. Failure to come to an agreement to pass his half-ass but mostly idiotic bill to extend a payroll tax holiday for two months instead of a year, which, even at a year, wouldn’t do much to change the job creation sentiment in America, which is what he says this is about.  He says their failure  –  not his  –  to make a deal and pass his bill will result in Americans losing $40 per paycheck. He’s right about the $40 but wrong about everything else.

This deceptive, hyper-partisan speech, from a guy who has never written a paycheck in his life, and has lived almost entirely off one government or government-subsidized payroll or another, and after his massively media-covered shopping trip yesterday –  which included his blowing $40 on Seasonal Greetings and Festivus crap for his freaking dog, which we were led to believe was in Hawaii on vacation with Michelle, but which he suddenly had at his side with him for a photo-op to make out as if he’s just an average Joe. (Was the dog flown back for the photo-op? That would have cost something more like $4,000.)

Then he was shown blowing another $40 buying three pizzas to take home. To the White House. You know, like the pizzas the First Lady has spent nearly the past three years lecturing us about not eating, and advancing all manner of government policies and mandates and regulations to get pizzas out of our homes and out of our schools.

He is “exactly why people get so frustrated with Washington.”

And this was the shortest day of the year.

 

UPDATE:  I read today where Obama’s vacay in Hawaii will cost taxpayers $4 MILLION.  That’s 100,000 times $40.

.